Policy · Ars Technica ·

Meta Removes 'Train' From Commercial Terms After AI Scraping Backlash

Meta dropped the word 'train' from its commercial terms of service after legal experts warned the policy could let it scrape business pages for AI training data, but won't add robots.txt protections.

Based on reporting by Ars Technica — analysis by dalili

Meta has removed the word "train" from its streamlined commercial terms of service, set to take effect October 30. The change follows backlash after legal experts warned that the sweeping new terms could allow Meta to endlessly scrape websites linked on business pages — potentially sidestepping millions in licensing fees from news organizations.

The original language, flagged by Nieman Lab, appeared to require all business users to share a wealth of AI training data simply for operating a business page on the platform. Legal experts described the terms as "broad enough to drive a truck through," raising concerns that Meta could use the policy to build training datasets without compensating content creators.

In response, Meta provided a statement acknowledging the concerns: "We've heard you and want to clarify: the crawling terms we consolidated only applied to our ads and business products, and we've clarified that in the terms themselves. It does not change how Meta uses web crawlers. As always, content owners can use robots.txt to signal their preferences."

However, Meta will not add explicit language respecting robots.txt directives — a concession that experts say doesn't go far enough. The same legal scholars who raised the initial alarms note that the revised terms still leave significant ambiguity about what data Meta can collect from business pages and how it can be used for AI model development.

Key takeaways

  • Meta removed 'train' from commercial TOS after legal experts flagged AI scraping concerns
  • Original terms could have let Meta scrape business pages for training data without compensation
  • Meta won't add explicit robots.txt protections despite expert criticism
  • Revised terms take effect October 30 with significant ambiguity remaining

Why it matters

The episode exposes the fundamental tension in AI training data: platforms want maximum flexibility to build models, while content creators demand compensation and control. Meta's partial retreat — removing one word but refusing robots.txt protections — satisfies neither side. For news organizations already struggling with AI-driven traffic declines, this sets a troubling precedent about who controls the value of their content.

Related

  1. TechCrunch ·

    Anthropic Proposes AI Safety Bill With Catastrophic Risk Thresholds