How we choose tools

dalili.tools content — both the directory and the news — is produced with the help of AI tools and then reviewed by a human before it is published. Because that affects how much you can trust what you read, here is how the process works.

Where the tools come from

We track new tool launches from several sources: launch platforms, specialist newsletters, reader suggestions, and things we try ourselves. From that long list we pick a small daily batch that we think is worth a reader's time.

Inclusion criteria

• Genuine usefulness: the tool solves a clear problem, not just a tech demo.
• Actually usable: publicly available now, not a closed waitlist or a "coming soon" page.
• Credibility: a known maker or a working product, not a landing page with nothing behind it.
• Variety: we balance batches across categories (coding, design, writing, productivity, video, audio) rather than repeating one type.
• Relevance to Arabic-speaking readers: we give extra weight to tools that support Arabic or are useful to users in the region.

What does not influence the decision

• Payment: we do not accept payment for inclusion, or to change a tool's ranking or description.
• Commissions: links to tool websites are organic and unpaid.
• Relationships: a tool's closeness to any particular company does not earn it a place or rule it out.

How the content is written and reviewed

We use AI tools to draft the first version of each description and news summary, in both Arabic and English. Each item then goes through a human review: we check the link, that the description matches what the tool actually does, that it is free of hype, and that the two language versions agree. Nothing is published without that review.

Corrections

Despite the review, errors happen — a price changes, a feature is removed, a link breaks. If you spot one, tell us via the contact page and we will fix it. We update the modified date on pages when a material change is made.

Removal

We remove a tool if it stops working, turns out to be misleading or harmful, or its owner asks us to for a good reason.

For more on our editorial independence, see the About page and the Terms of Use.